<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BenjaminRoyce.com - A Portal For New Media, Tech and Small Businesses by Benjamin Royce &#187; e-commerce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benjaminroyce.com/tag/e-commerce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benjaminroyce.com</link>
	<description>I sort through the nerd stuff, so you don&#039;t have to.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:42:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Social Networks Aren&#8217;t The Best SEO Links</title>
		<link>http://www.benjaminroyce.com/2010/11/why-social-networks-arent-the-best-links-for-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benjaminroyce.com/2010/11/why-social-networks-arent-the-best-links-for-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benjaminroyce.com/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I keep reading about how link exchanges are terrible and can permanently damage your rank. This is true, you should know by now that there is no magic bullet for SEO. It takes good ol&#8217; (relevant) hard work. But many people are suggesting the treasure trove of social networks as a source of links. This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep reading about how link exchanges are terrible and can permanently damage your rank. This is true, you should know by now that there is no magic bullet for SEO. It takes good ol&#8217; (relevant) hard work.</p>
<p>But many people are suggesting the treasure trove of social networks as a source of links. This comes with a major caveat, NOT ALL SOCIAL NETWORKS CREATE LINKS EQUALLY.</p>
<p>Twitter has been pressured (probably by Google) to attach &#8216;nofollow&#8217; tags to outgoing links on tweets. What does this mean? It means you can post nonillion (yes, that&#8217;s a real number) links from as many Twitter accounts as you can marshall and it won&#8217;t count as a back link. Sorry.</p>
<div id="attachment_374" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 267px"><a href="http://www.benjaminroyce.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/nofollow.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-374" title="nofollow tag, the link killer" src="http://www.benjaminroyce.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/nofollow.jpg" alt="nofollow tag, the link killer" width="257" height="85" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The &#39;nofollow&#39; tag, the link killer</p></div>
<p>Facebook does the same. In fact, Facebook has a function called UntrustedLink, which essentially is an anti-spamming tool. It adds the &#8216;nofollow&#8217; tag so that search engines do not follow the link. This means no link credit.</p>
<p>What it can help you with is getting traffic through those tweets and hopefully those will get indexed by the search engines. So once again, build links by doing something remarkable. Then links will come to you, and of course you can always supplement that with traditional link building. But remember, if it&#8217;s too easy, you&#8217;ll get penalized, or no credit at the least.</p>
<p>Digg and Delicious are still search engine and link friendly, but it appears that Reddit is not. Any other updates on link friendliness? Comment below!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benjaminroyce.com/2010/11/why-social-networks-arent-the-best-links-for-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 Buzz Phrases and Search Engine Myths That Need A Bazooka Reality Check</title>
		<link>http://www.benjaminroyce.com/2010/02/3-buzzwords-phrases-and-search-engine-myths-that-need-a-bazooka-reality-check/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benjaminroyce.com/2010/02/3-buzzwords-phrases-and-search-engine-myths-that-need-a-bazooka-reality-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benjaminroyce.com/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adam Ostrow (@Adam Ostrow) said it best on Twitter: You know how politicians often break out the &#8220;tax ax&#8220;? I think I&#8217;m going to coin the &#8220;buzzword bazooka&#8220; If &#8216;pride goes before the fall&#8217;, then buzzwords go before pride. If you work with search engines, you should probably know a few languages including HTML (I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Adam Ostrow (<a href="http://twitter.com/adamostrow" target="_blank">@Adam Ostrow</a>) said it best on Twitter:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>You know how politicians often break out the &#8220;<strong>tax ax</strong>&#8220;?<br />
I think I&#8217;m going to coin the &#8220;<strong>buzzword</strong> <strong>bazooka</strong>&#8220;</em></p>
<p>If &#8216;pride goes before the fall&#8217;, then buzzwords go before pride.</p>
<p>If you work with search engines, you should probably know a few languages including HTML (I know it&#8217;s only markup!), PHP and Javascript. You don&#8217;t need to be fluent in PHP or Javascript, but you should at least know how to order dinner and find the toilet.</p>
<p>The fact is that search engine theory is just that, theory. Only a very few number of people know exactly how Google, MSNbot and Yahoo (soon to be Bing/MSNbot) crawlers work in a scientific sense. They&#8217;re not going to tell us anytime soon, just like Coca-Cola isn&#8217;t going to be tweeting their famous recipe any time soon. You have a whole industry based on theory, and rarely is it scientific enough to pass any muster. Buzzwords and phrases thrive in such areas. So let&#8217;s break down some fallacies.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" title="Lego Bazooka" src="http://www.benjaminroyce.com/images/legobazooka.jpg" alt="Lego Bazooka" width="200" height="218" /></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Content is king</strong>: Flat out wrong. The conversion is king. How you define conversion is your own choice, such as a sale, a newsletter sign up, or a lead. What ever it is, if you have millions of visitors, and the site hasn&#8217;t generated anything for you but server load, you can talk about content all day and it won&#8217;t matter. The fact is that your website has a goal, perhaps monetary or just collecting data. Content is a part of getting conversions, and helps bring that data in, but if you have a store full of browsers and no buyers, you really can&#8217;t show that to an investor.  New buzz phrase that won&#8217;t catch on, but should: <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Content is a high ranking military strategist</span>.</li>
<li><strong>It&#8217;s all about links</strong>: Frustrating. This is like having 1,000 acquaintances and no real friends. For every link that you make a visitor/customer jump through you have a loss of about 9%. Considering all your customer has to do is literally lift a finger, that&#8217;s quite alarming.<br />
Yes, link building is important. Content more so, but if you have a background in marketing, you probably know how to make content compelling, and conversion friendly already. In a world of exponential social media growth, why link to your twitter account when you can integrate live streams getting the content AND the link search engine credit? Why link, when you can INTEGRATE?<br />
New buzz phrase that won&#8217;t catch on, but should: <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Linking is the poor man&#8217;s integrating</span>.</li>
<li><strong>We don&#8217;t have time for Social Media</strong>. Oh really? I suppose you don&#8217;t have a customer service phone either then. Customer service doesn&#8217;t generate much revenue, it prevents lost revenue. Business has made it so hard to get something fixed in the name of cost cutting that <a href="http://theoatmeal.com/comics/customer_service" target="_blank">The Oatmeal sums it up best.</a> If I have a product that doesn&#8217;t work as it is supposed to, I have a 50% chance that I will ebay it, just so I don&#8217;t have to deal with a non-tech savvy dotard reading from a HTML wizard.<br />
Social media, when used socially and not a one way sales push pipe, can transform your target audience&#8217;s perception of you. Imagine actually being able to create a quick custom check list of things to check for on their own time for each person because you have a record of their issue and statements. Who would call then?<br />
I know what you&#8217;re thinking.<em> Ben we don&#8217;t have the resources for that. </em>If I learned anything as a teenager, it was that I can have 5 simultaneous conversations online as opposed to 1 on the phone. By that measure, for every 5 of your phone reps I need one social rep. Sounds like a money saver down the road considering more than half the world population is under 30. Plus it is SEO friendly provided the <a href="http://searchengineland.com/analysis-which-url-shortening-service-should-you-use-17204" target="_blank">link shorteners are 301 redirects</a>.<br />
New buzz phrase that won&#8217;t catch on, but should: <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Social is the new survey/customer service hybrid</span>.</li>
</ol>
<p>Yes these are all parts of the search engine system, but take a step back and realise that it is a dance. You can&#8217;t dance with one leg, and you can&#8217;t get to the top of the page rank with just links. Spending too much time on SEO and not on being better for your customer is only the marginal gain you could have from actually just being better than your competitor.</p>
<p>So, what other buzzwords and theories need a bazooka reality check?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benjaminroyce.com/2010/02/3-buzzwords-phrases-and-search-engine-myths-that-need-a-bazooka-reality-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women Now Dominate European Online Retail</title>
		<link>http://www.benjaminroyce.com/2010/02/women-now-dominate-european-online-retail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benjaminroyce.com/2010/02/women-now-dominate-european-online-retail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benjaminroyce.com/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over 61% of online transactions in Europe were initiated by women in 2009. This is in direct contrast to 44% in 2007. Men still dominated travel and services online, but electronic retail now a majority female sector. Data based on some 8 million transactions, not surveys shows that the demographics of online retailing are not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over 61% of online transactions in Europe were initiated by women in 2009. This is in direct contrast to 44% in 2007. Men still dominated travel and services online, but electronic retail now a majority female sector.  Data based on some 8 million transactions, not surveys shows that the demographics of online retailing are not just changing, but are correcting for the vacuum of products for women that were not making it online.</p>
<p>The fact is that technology is unnecessarily dominated by men, and the products they produce are reflective of that imbalance. 2009 proved to start correcting that imbalance because of innovation in delivery technology and analytics research. It was about time that female dominated product categories had their moment online.</p>
<p>The real question from here on is, will that number stay relatively similar? Is this a surge to stay or will women continue to dominate online retail?</p>
<p>You can download the full Press Release from Deutsche Card Services here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.deutsche-card-services.com/en/company/press-room/latest-news/latest-news-detail/article/e-retail-report-frauen-dominieren-den-online-handel.html?tx_ttnews[backPid]=181&amp;cHash=97f3ab4f21" target="_blank">http://www.deutsche-card-services.com/en/company/press-room/latest-news/latest-news-detail/article/e-retail-report-frauen-dominieren-den-online-handel.html?tx_ttnews[backPid]=181&amp;cHash=97f3ab4f21</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.benjaminroyce.com"><img class="aligncenter" title="BenjaminRoyce.com Logo" src="http://www.benjaminroyce.com/images/logolong260.jpg" alt="" width="260" height="41" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benjaminroyce.com/2010/02/women-now-dominate-european-online-retail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

